英语翻译For our current purposes our concern with reference grou

英语翻译
For our current purposes our concern with reference groups is restricted
to issues relating to the rationale underlying at risk of poverty measures.
Factors other than current life-style deprivation clearly impact on outcome
variables,such as subjective economic stress,with which we are concerned.
Reference to \2restricted reference groups\1 must be taken as a shorthand way
of referring to complex processes of evaluation of what it is \2reasonable\1 or
\2fair\1 to expect (Jasso and Rossi,1977; Jasso,1980).The relative weight of
different comparisons may also change over time as people\1s aspirations and
expectations change.Kelley and Zagorski (2005) show how the shift towards
a free-market economy in Central-East Europe dramatically changed
the public\1s norms about income inequality.Thus a complete explanation of
subjective responses,such as economic stress,and variation in such levels
across geographic units,goes well beyond our current brief.Our key
question is whether the relationship between deprivation and the subjective
experience of such deprivation varies across geographical or analytic units in
a manner that provides support for the use of relative income poverty
measures as valid social indicators in an enlarged EU.In seeking to confront
this issue we do so not by addressing questions directly related to such
comparison to respondents but by seeking to infer their reference groups
from their reactions to objective circumstances.Measures of life-style
deprivation,capturing as they do both failure to fulfil current consumption
aspirations and the consequences of past successes and failures in accumulating
items,are likely to be a powerful predictors of subjective economic
stress.
不要google上在线翻译下

对于我们当前的目的我们的关注与参考群体的限制
有关的问题的理由根本上的贫困风险的措施.
之外的其他因素现行的生活方式被剥夺明确影响的结果
变量,如主观的经济压力,与我们所关注.
提及?限制范围的群体?必须考虑到作为一个速记方式
提及复杂过程的评价是什么?是否合理?奥勒岗
公平吗?期待（ Jasso和罗西,1977年; Jasso ,1980年） .的相对权重
不同的比较也可能随着时间推移而改变,因为人们问的愿望和
预期的变化.凯利和扎古尔斯基（ 2005 ）显示如何转向
自由市场经济中环东南欧急剧变化
市民问规范关于收入不平等.因此一个完整的解释
主观的反应,如经济压力,在这种水平的变化
在地理单元,远远超出我们目前的简短.我们的主要
问题是,是否剥夺之间的关系和主观
这种剥夺的经验而有所不同地域或解析单位
的方式,提供支持使用相对收入贫困
措施是有效的社会指标在扩大的欧盟.在寻求对付
这个问题,我们这样做并不是解决问题直接相关,如
受访者相比,但通过寻求推断其参考群体
从他们的反应,客观情况.措施的生活方式
剥夺,捕获,因为它们两者都做不履行电流消耗
愿望和后果,过去的成功与失败中积累
项目,很可能是一个强大的经济预测主观
应力.