作业帮 > 英语 > 作业

英语翻译A related battery of items probed the multidimensional n

来源:学生作业帮 编辑:灵鹊做题网作业帮 分类:英语作业 时间:2024/04/29 16:40:29
英语翻译
A related battery of items probed the multidimensional nature of institutional confidence and approval:we queried about the approval of institutions as such as well as the current crop of institutional actors.3Finally,we included a large set of measures which concerned the media,political indicators (partisanship,ideology,assessment of national and personal financial situation) and demographics (education,income,race,etc.).
The temporary nature of the spike is illustrated most extensively by Bowman (2004).Therewas,indeed,a lasting rally that extended well into the spring of 2002 on evaluations of thepresident.However,as a comparison of the GSS measures for confidence in various institutionsreveals,there were few significant differences between confidence levels in 2000 and 2002.Themost enduring changes after 9/11 include higher levels of confidence in the military andendorsement by the public of governmental activities designed to ensure American security,whether that includes domestic security or wars in Iraq or Afghanistan.To our knowledge,noone has yet made a case that 9/11 changed the causes of trust in some significant way
However,since some scholarship suggests the latter question measures responsiveness more than trust(Chanley,Rudolph,and Rahn 2001),and since others have defended using simply the single"trust-to-do-what-is-right" question (Alford 2001) as the measure that is most commonlyrepeated over a longer period of time,we have chosen to focus our analysis here on thatquestion.
英语翻译A related battery of items probed the multidimensional n
没有上下文,理解起来比较困难,能看得出应该是在研究社会公众的制度信任和衡量反应方面的问题吧.

这个有关联性的所有项的动力源,调查了体制信任、体制批准的多面性:我们不但质疑体制已经准许的东西,还质疑体制执行者当前正在做的结果.最后我们甚至能囊括进一大堆的措施,包括关注媒体的、政治晴雨表(党派之争、意识形态、国家金融和个人经济的评估情况),还有人口统计数据(教育状况、收入状况、种族情况等等).
布曼在2004年最广泛地举例论证了这个呈现细长形状的临时特性.确切地说,是作为对那位总统的评价,一场持续的团结成功地延伸到了2002年春.不过,如果做一个对各种制度监督的信任的GSS评估体系的比较,在2000年和2002年的信任方面,几乎没有不同.911后最持久的变化包括了公众更高的对由政府行为导致的、保证美国安全的军事行为的信任度,不管是国内安全措施,还是伊拉克或阿富汗战争. 对我们的认知而言,没有人能再找出一个象911那样在一些重大方式上改变信任原因的例子了.
可是,也有另外一些见解(2001年,Chanley, Rudolph和Rahn)建议,接下来问题测量响应度应该多于测量信任度,并且,从别人开始抱着防卫心理、简单地只用“做正确事的信任”的方式,来作为对最普通的长期简单重复的(阿尔福德,2001年)问题的诠释那时候起,我们已经选择了在这里聚焦注意力在测量响应度上的分析.