英语翻译Passage 11Should we allow smoking in public places?This

英语翻译
Passage 11
Should we allow smoking in public places?This is an important question being discussed in American society today.This article compares two totally different opinions.
The first opinion is held by Joseph Califano,past United States Secretary of Health,Education and Welfare,who believes that smoking shouldn't be allowed in public places.Califano states that "People should not be forced to breathe other's smoke." He supports his opinion with numbers,such as,"5,000 Americans die each year because of other people's smoke." He believes that this is something we can't ignore.He,therefore,supports the restriction of smoking in every public place,including schools,hospitals,theaters,and other work areas,with extra sections for smokers.According to Califano,the cost of controlling smoking wouldn't be very high.Califano even thinks that people will save money by reducing illness.The idea would be to protect non-smokers.He has said "People who smoke are slowly killing themselves.The point is to prevent their smoking from becoming a slow murder of others."
The second opinion is against controlling smoking in public places.Paul Screvane,former president of the New York City Council,sees the problem in a different way.He takes the view that restricting smoking in public places "would set up two classes of citizens and would make many people angry".A law to stop smoking in public places could not be enforced,because the police are too busy.Screvane says that he can find "no facts that prove smoke from other people is a danger".He says that scientists could not prove that cigarette smoke is dangerous to other people who don't smoke.He states that people working in the same office must sit near each other,and the cost of changing offices to avoid smoke is too great.Screvane,a heavy smoker himself,would lose too much time if he had to go to a special area three or four times an hour.He believes that creating no smoking areas would cost too much money and waste too much time.
These two men,it seems,will never agree.They fight each other,and at the same time defend their own opinions with examples,numbers,and personal experience.There are no similarities in their ideas,except perhaps the point about smoking in restaurants.Screvane believes that smoking in restaurants should be stopped,if many customers demand it.Califano wishes to protect people's health from the dangers of smoke.He cares a lot about public health and safety.Screvane cares about creating different classes of people in society,about money,and about time,but he never talks about public health and safety.

通道11
我们应该允许在公共场所吸烟?这是一个重要的问题正在讨论在美国社会今天.本文比较了两个完全不同的意见.
    第一个意见是由约瑟夫卡利法诺,过去美国国务卿卫生,教育和福利,谁认为,吸烟不应该允许在公共场所.卡利法诺说,“人们不应该被迫呼吸其他的烟.”他支持他的意见与数字,如,“ 5万美国人每年死于因为其他人的烟雾.”他认为,这是我们所不能忽视的.因此,他支持限制吸烟在每一个公共场所,包括学校,医院,电影院,和其他工作领域,额外部分吸烟者.据卡利法诺的成本控制吸烟将不会很高.卡利法诺甚至认为,人们会节省资金,减少疾病.这个想法是将保护不吸烟者.他说：“人们正在慢慢谁烟雾造成自己.重要的是防止其吸烟成为一个缓慢谋杀他人.”
第二个意见是针对控制在公共场所吸烟.保罗Screvane前总统,纽约市议会,看待这个问题,以不同的方式.他认为,限制在公共场所吸烟“将设立两个类别的公民和会使很多人感到愤怒.”一项法律,制止在公共场所吸烟不能强制执行,因为警察是太忙了.Screvane说,他可以找到“没有事实证明吸烟是从其他人的危险.”他说,科学家无法证明,香烟烟雾是危险的其他人谁也不要吸烟.他指出,工作的人在同一办公室必须坐在靠近对方,和成本变化的办事处,以避免烟雾太大.Screvane ,一个烟鬼自己,将失去的时间太多了,如果他去的一个特殊领域3次或4次一个小时.他认为,建立禁止吸烟区将花费太多的钱和浪费太多时间.
    这两个男人,似乎永远不会同意.他们彼此争斗,同时捍卫自己的意见的例子,没有相似之处他们的想法,但也许是约在饭馆吸烟.Screvane认为,在饭馆吸烟应该停止,如果许多客户所要求的.卡利法诺的愿望,保护人民群众的身体健康的危险的烟雾.他在乎了很多公众的健康和安全.Screvane关心建立不同类别的人在社会中,金钱,以及时间,但他从来没有谈到公众健康和安全.