灵鹊做题网跪求英语高手帮助翻译英语文摘!10
来源：学生作业帮 编辑：灵鹊做题网作业帮 分类：英语作业 时间：2024/04/29 18:44:10
跪求英语高手帮助翻译英语文摘!10
To model cost against quality, quality can be measured
by the percentage of coverage and by the number of com-
plaints. By using the percentage of coverage to measure
quality, the costs of prevention and appraisal increase
when the quality increases as seen in Fig. 2. Costs of failure
are inversely proportional to costs of prevention and
appraisal, which decrease when quality increases. Further-
more, the company has spent around HK$10,000 to pro-
vide better vegetation coverage of hydro-seeding projects
for their clients, which shows significant quality
improvement.
With regard to quality measurement using the number
of complaints, Fig. 3 shows fewer complaints due to the
increase in cost quality for the project. The situation is sim-
ilar to the case obtained using the percentage of site cover-
age as shown in Fig. 2. When the costs of prevention and
appraisal decrease, the costs of failure increase and vice
versa. The costs of failure are also relatively lower than
the costs of prevention and appraisal.
From Figs. 2 and 3,it isdi?cultto show any break-even
point. Since the costs of prevention and appraisal are much
higher than the costs of failure, it suggests that this com-
pany may already use enough investments to prevent fail-
ures and to further improve quality.
As it is clear that the PAF modelling method cannot
reveal the correlation between the costs of prevention,
appraisal and failure, it is necessary to individually study
each of these costs by using other more e?ective methods.
One of them is the use of the hyperbolic and Gaussian dis- tributions employing the 6r concept which was reported by
Tam and Le [27]. In this paper, the Vandermonde interpo-
lation techniqueisproposed which cane?ectively showfine
details in the data, hence the location of the break-even or
optimal point. The main motivation of using this method is
because the Vandermonde interpolation technique has
been successfully used in the field of signal and image pro-
cessing to best-fit a given data set.
To model cost against quality, quality can be measured
by the percentage of coverage and by the number of com-
plaints. By using the percentage of coverage to measure
quality, the costs of prevention and appraisal increase
when the quality increases as seen in Fig. 2. Costs of failure
are inversely proportional to costs of prevention and
appraisal, which decrease when quality increases. Further-
more, the company has spent around HK$10,000 to pro-
vide better vegetation coverage of hydro-seeding projects
for their clients, which shows significant quality
improvement.
With regard to quality measurement using the number
of complaints, Fig. 3 shows fewer complaints due to the
increase in cost quality for the project. The situation is sim-
ilar to the case obtained using the percentage of site cover-
age as shown in Fig. 2. When the costs of prevention and
appraisal decrease, the costs of failure increase and vice
versa. The costs of failure are also relatively lower than
the costs of prevention and appraisal.
From Figs. 2 and 3,it isdi?cultto show any break-even
point. Since the costs of prevention and appraisal are much
higher than the costs of failure, it suggests that this com-
pany may already use enough investments to prevent fail-
ures and to further improve quality.
As it is clear that the PAF modelling method cannot
reveal the correlation between the costs of prevention,
appraisal and failure, it is necessary to individually study
each of these costs by using other more e?ective methods.
One of them is the use of the hyperbolic and Gaussian dis- tributions employing the 6r concept which was reported by
Tam and Le [27]. In this paper, the Vandermonde interpo-
lation techniqueisproposed which cane?ectively showfine
details in the data, hence the location of the break-even or
optimal point. The main motivation of using this method is
because the Vandermonde interpolation technique has
been successfully used in the field of signal and image pro-
cessing to best-fit a given data set.
模型的成本对质量,质量可以衡量
由百分比的覆盖面和人数,通过COM的
plaints .用百分比的范围来衡量
质量,成本,预防和评估增加
当质量增加,可以看出在图.2 .成本失败
是成反比预防费用和
其中减少时,质量增加.进一步-
此外,该公司已花了约港币10000亲
随更好地植被覆盖度的水力发电播种项目
为他们的客户,显示出显着的质量
改善.
关于质量测量使用的数目
投诉,图.3显示更少的投诉,由于该
增加的成本质量的项目.情况是SIM卡
ilar该案件得到了使用网站的用户比例掩盖
年龄显示,在图.2 .当预防费用和
成本增加的失败和副主席
反之亦然.的成本,失败的也相对低于
预防费用和评价.
从图.第2和第3 ,isdi cultto显示任何突破,甚至
点.由于预防费用和考核等,都是多
高于成本的失败,表明此COM -
pany可能已经使用了足够的投资,以防止停电
ures ,并进一步提高质量.
因为它是明确指出,血小板活化因子建模方法不能
揭示之间的相关性预防费用,
评价和失败,是有必要单独研究
每年这些费用用其他更多电子?ective方法.
其中一人是利用双曲和高斯的存款保险计划- tributions聘用6受体的概念,据报道,由
谭和乐[ 27 ] .在这个文件中,范德蒙interpo -
lation techniqueisproposed ,其中甘蔗?ectively showfine
在细节的数据,因此位置的突破,甚至或
最佳点.主要的动机,使用这种方法是
因为范德蒙插值技术
被成功地用于在该领域的信号和图像亲
cessing ,以最适合某一特定的数据集.
由百分比的覆盖面和人数,通过COM的
plaints .用百分比的范围来衡量
质量,成本,预防和评估增加
当质量增加,可以看出在图.2 .成本失败
是成反比预防费用和
其中减少时,质量增加.进一步-
此外,该公司已花了约港币10000亲
随更好地植被覆盖度的水力发电播种项目
为他们的客户,显示出显着的质量
改善.
关于质量测量使用的数目
投诉,图.3显示更少的投诉,由于该
增加的成本质量的项目.情况是SIM卡
ilar该案件得到了使用网站的用户比例掩盖
年龄显示,在图.2 .当预防费用和
成本增加的失败和副主席
反之亦然.的成本,失败的也相对低于
预防费用和评价.
从图.第2和第3 ,isdi cultto显示任何突破,甚至
点.由于预防费用和考核等,都是多
高于成本的失败,表明此COM -
pany可能已经使用了足够的投资,以防止停电
ures ,并进一步提高质量.
因为它是明确指出,血小板活化因子建模方法不能
揭示之间的相关性预防费用,
评价和失败,是有必要单独研究
每年这些费用用其他更多电子?ective方法.
其中一人是利用双曲和高斯的存款保险计划- tributions聘用6受体的概念,据报道,由
谭和乐[ 27 ] .在这个文件中,范德蒙interpo -
lation techniqueisproposed ,其中甘蔗?ectively showfine
在细节的数据,因此位置的突破,甚至或
最佳点.主要的动机,使用这种方法是
因为范德蒙插值技术
被成功地用于在该领域的信号和图像亲
cessing ,以最适合某一特定的数据集.