英语翻译Fig.6(b) also presents ground-level concentrations for t

英语翻译
Fig.6(b) also presents ground-level concentrations for the floating roof tank (FRT),for a circumferential release around the roof/wall annulus with the roof at 0.5Hb.Concentrations are seen to be significantly higher,the maximum being a factor of two greater,in the immediate wake (x/Hb1.25 but does not match it until Hs/Hb≈1.35.For the A=0.5 case CY2 and CB2-0° produce almost identical Cmax values over the entire release height range.CB2-45° produces significantly higher Cmax values over this range.
similar,both consisting of the recirculation region and roof top vortices.Cmax for the cylinder tank approaches that of the cube at 0° for release heights Hs/Hb>1.25 but does not match it until Hs/Hb≈1.35.For the A=0.5 case CY2 and CB2-0° produce almost identical Cmax values over the entire release height range.CB2-45° produces significantly higher Cmax values over this range.
Fig.8 and Fig.9 present contours of the elevated non-dimensional concentration fields for the building cases CY1,CB1-0° and CB1-45°.The figures follow the same notation as for the isolated release described in Section 3.1,in addition the locus of maximum concentration is also indicated in the x–z plane plots.In all cases the release is at (x,y,z)/Hb=(0,0,1).These figures provide a clear picture of the different plume structures in each of these building affected release cases.Fig.5 showed the form of the plume in the undisturbed boundary layer.The presence of the buildings clearly results in the well known feature of plume entrainment and transport down to ground level in the wake of the obstacle.From Fig.8 and Fig.9 a broad similarity between CY1 and CB1-45° cube is apparent.
翻得好的有加分

这么长这么专业的还是自己翻吧